Newspapers: Where Words are Born, Not “Where Words Go to Die”

Author Seth Godin, in a post about how to be a successful non-fiction writer, said, “a non-fiction book is a souvenir, just a vessel for the ideas themselves. You don’t want the ideas to get stuck in the book… you want them to spread.”

I thought about this statement as I stared at the pile of newspapers in the back of my car. These non-fiction “vessels for ideas” lay unopened, unread and unimportant in a world where people move too fast and information is in a constant race to keep up. When a newspaper yells “Fire!” everyone has already left the theater, running to soak in the next story on television, the Internet, mobile phone or other modern convenience that trumps ever-declining newspaper readership.

Newspapers have an unenviable task: No matter how much work reporters and editors do in a day, they can’t overcome the “dead zone” between the time the paper has to go to press and the time it arrives on our driveways. It may only be a matter of hours, but that’s long enough for a Tsunami to kill thousands or Mel Gibson to get pulled over for drunken driving. Newspapers, unable to compete for scoops in a world without pause, are almost always O.O.A. – Obsolete On Arrival.

This doesn’t mean, however, that newspapers are, as some believe, “Where words go to die.” Quite the opposite: If words are representations of thought – or as Godin might say, “vessels for ideas,” then newspapers are where words are born.

Newspapers are at their best in afterthought and analysis, in forming opinions and offering perspective. And while they can’t "do" breaking news anymore, they can break big news, such as the stories about covert domestic wiretapping and secret government prisons. The best newspapers give us words that live far beyond their vessels’ unceremonious trips to the recycle bin.

Newspapers need to do a better job of spreading their ideas to other mediums. This will require newspaper companies to stop thinking of paper as The Paper – it’s the newspaper’s function that matters most now, not its form. The Los Angeles Times should always be the Los Angeles Times, whether it’s in the back of my car, on my Google home page or in my IPod.

As long as newspapers continue to spread ideas – to write words that live – then they will matter. They will avoid becoming relics and will progress into a new future: A future, perhaps, without newsprint, but with plenty of news.

3 thoughts on “Newspapers: Where Words are Born, Not “Where Words Go to Die”

  1. You make some excellent points on behalf of newspapers, Gary.
    Newspapers definitely have their place. Practically no place else can you get the detailed, in-depth coverage, analysis, and even the periodic breaking news (but that’s mostly from the investigative side of journalism — where newspapers uncover stories; not break them).
    Newspapers, as you noted, need to get the “papers” out of their name, sort to speak, and focus on news. They need to be more aggressive with with online presence and offer e-mail alerts, summaries of each day’s issue via e-mail, etc.
    Newspapers are experts at gathering information. They just need to get better at distributing it.

  2. Newspapers just need to step up

    A couple posts this week stoked the old journalistic fires in me, but more on the business side of the newspaper business. One was by Mike Bawden, and the other by Gary Goldhammer. While I love public relations and enjoy…

  3. Espresso Book Machine Debuts at World Bank

    One could spend all day debating the changes in media and publishing that are occurring due in large part to the Internet.Indeed, Know More Media exists because of the ability to access and publish content from expert authors all over…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: